The process is single-blind for most journals, meaning that the author does not know the identity of the reviewer, but the reviewer knows the identity of the author. Some journals operate double-blind peer review.

At least two review reports are collected for each submitted article. Suggestions of reviewers can be made by the academic editor during pre-check. Alternatively, Tagliche Praxis editorial staff will use qualified Editorial Board Members, qualified reviewers from our database, or new reviewers identified by web searches for related articles.

The following checks are applied to all reviewers:

• That they hold no conflicts of interest with the authors, including if they have published together in the last five years;
• That they hold a Ph.D. (exceptions are made in some fields);
• They must have recent publications in the field of the submitted paper;
• They have not recently been invited to review a manuscript for the Tagliche Praxis journal.

The impact of your work will have on researchers outside your field and the potential for greater exposure.

Increase visibility, availability, and readership of your work on the internet which attracts good citations.

All the articles are available free to download, distribute & share. For more information visit Open Access Information and Policy

To ensure that your next paper for publication is available online for your peers to read and cite as quickly as possible through using our state-of-art Online Peer Review System consisting of more than 5000 reviewers.